The Complete Guide to ISO 22002 PRP Updates for Food Manufacturers
Introduction:
If you’re a food safety manager, you’re likely aware of the changes to ISO 22002. But what do they actually mean for your facility, and when do you need to act?
This guide breaks down the transition from the familiar ISO/TS 22002-1:2009 to the new ISO 22002-100:2025 + ISO 22002-1 structure. We’ll focus on practical changes, actionable steps, and the critical timeline linked to FSSC 22000 Version 7.
This guide is your practical companion through this transition.
We’ll demystify the move from the old, standalone standard to the new ISO 22002-100:2025 + ISO 22002-1 structure. More importantly, we’ll connect these changes directly to the upcoming FSSC 22000 Version 7, providing you with a clear action plan and timeline.
Consider this your strategic roadmap for building a stronger, more future-proof food safety programme.
SECTION 1: The New Global PRP Architecture
1.1 A Universal Foundation with Specialised Building Blocks
The most significant change is fundamental: a complete structural overhaul of the entire ISO 22002 series. The old model of separate, parallel standards has been replaced with an integrated, two-layer system designed for consistency across the global supply chain.
- Layer 1: The Common Foundation (ISO 22002-100:2025)
This is the new core document. It consolidates all universal prerequisite programme requirements applicable to every organization in the food, feed, and packaging supply chains. Think of it as the rulebook for essential hygiene and operational controls that everyone must follow, regardless of their specific sector. - Layer 2: The Sector-Specific Additions (ISO 22002-x:2025 Series)
These are the specialised “modules” that build upon the common foundation. For food manufacturers, this is ISO 22002-1:2025. It contains the additional, detailed requirements specific to the complexities of food processing that are not covered in the general foundation standard.
Your New Compliance Reality:
To be fully compliant, your facility must implement the requirements from both ISO 22002-100 and ISO 22002-1. They are designed to be used together as one complete set of PRPs for food manufacturing.
1.2 The Full PRP Series: What’s Changed and What Hasn’t
In 2025, the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) published a comprehensive revision of the entire PRP series. The table below provides a complete overview of every standard, its update status, and its role in the new system.
| Sector / Scope | Previous Standard (Old) | 2025 Publication (New) | Status & Key Change |
| Common Requirements | Did not exist | ISO 22002-100:2025 | ⚠️ BRAND NEW. Defines common PRPs for all supply chain sectors except primary production. |
| Food Manufacturing | ISO/TS 22002-1:2009 | ISO 22002-1:2025 | ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION. To be used in conjunction with ISO 22002-100. |
| Catering | ISO/TS 22002-2:2013 | ISO 22002-2:2025 | ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION. To be used in conjunction with ISO 22002-100. |
| Food Packaging Manufacturing | ISO/TS 22002-4:2013 | ISO 22002-4:2025 | ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION. To be used in conjunction with ISO 22002-100. |
| Transport & Storage | ISO/TS 22002-5:2019 | ISO 22002-5:2025 | ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION. To be used in conjunction with ISO 22002-100. |
| Feed & Animal Food Production | ISO/TS 22002-6:2016 | ISO 22002-6:2025 | ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION. To be used in conjunction with ISO 22002-100. |
| Retail & Wholesale | PAS 221:2013 | ISO 22002-7:2025 | ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION. Newly integrated into the ISO series; to be used with ISO 22002-100. |
| Farming (Primary Production) | ISO/TS 22002-3:2011 | ISO 22002-3 remains valid | ✅ UNCHANGED. Explicitly excluded from the scope of ISO 22002-100. |
Critical Note on Scope: The new common standard (ISO 22002-100) specifically states that its requirements are not applicable to primary production activities (farming). Organisations in this sector should continue to use the existing and unchanged ISO 22002-3 standard.
1.3 The FSSC 22000 Version 7 Connection: Your Certification Timeline
This ISO revision is not happening in a vacuum. The Foundation for Food Safety Certification (FSSC) has officially confirmed that the publication of the new ISO 22002 series is the primary driver for developing FSSC 22000 Version 7 of its globally recognised certification scheme.
What This Means for Certified Sites:
Your FSSC 22000 certificate will eventually need to be upgraded to Version 7, which will mandate the use of the new ISO 22002-100 and 22002-1 standards. The FSSC has provided a clear and manageable transition pathway.
Key Transition Dates:
| Milestone | Expected Timeframe | What It Means For You |
| Publication of FSSC 22000 Version 7 | End of Q1 / Beginning of Q2 2026 | The new scheme documents become official. |
| Start of 12-Month Transition Period | Immediately upon V7 publication | You may begin (and should plan for) implementation. |
| End of Transition Period | Approximately 12 months after V7 publication | All FSSC 22000 audits will be conducted against the new Version 7 requirements. |
Your Immediate Takeaway:
FSSC 22000 Version 6 remains fully valid and continues to reference the old ISO/TS 22002 series. This official timeline grants you a valuable planning and preparation window—use it strategically. There is no need for immediate panic, but proactive preparation is essential.
SECTION 2: Comprehensive Clause-by-Clause Analysis for Food Manufacturers
This section provides a detailed breakdown of every clause in the new structure, highlighting what has changed, what is new, and what remains consistent for food manufacturing sites.
Clause 4: Construction & Layout of Buildings
- Change Level: ⚠️ Enhanced & Restructured
- What’s New/Enhanced: The requirements are now explicitly linked to the concepts of fitness for purpose and risk. You must be able to justify that your building design, layout, and drainage systems are suitable for your specific operations and capacity. There is a stronger emphasis on assessing both internal and external sources of environmental contamination.
- Auditor Focus: “Can you explain why your building and drainage design is appropriate for your specific process risks?”
Clause 5: Design & Layout of Facilities & Workspaces
- Change Level: ⚠️ Enhanced with New Focus
- What’s New/Enhanced: This clause now strongly emphasises logical flow and zoning. The concept of risk-based zoning is formally introduced. You must define zones (e.g., raw material, processing, high-care) appropriate to your product and process risks and control the movement of people, materials, and airflow between them. Equipment location must facilitate cleaning and maintenance.
- Auditor Focus: “Show me your plant layout with defined zones and describe how you control movement between them.”
Clause 6: Utilities
- Change Level: ⚠️ Enhanced & Clarified
- What’s New/Enhanced: Requirements for water, air, and other utilities are more precise. You must define quality specifications based on the utility’s intended use (e.g., potable water for ingredient vs. non-potable for cooling). There is a clearer expectation for active monitoring and maintenance. Non-potable systems must be unmistakably identified.
- Auditor Focus: “What are your quality specifications for compressed air that contacts product, and how do you monitor it?”
Clause 7: Pest Control
- Change Level: ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION
- What’s New/Enhanced: This marks a philosophical shift from reactive treatment to a preventive system. The standard mandates a four-stage lifecycle: 1) Prevent Access, 2) Remove Harbourage, 3) Monitor & Detect, 4) Eradicate & Review. Key new requirements include appointing a competent, responsible person, conducting trend analysis of monitoring data, and actively removing potential pest shelters.
- Auditor Focus: “Do you analyse pest activity trends, or just file the contractor’s monthly report?”
Clause 8: Waste, Food Loss & Food Waste Management
- Change Level: ⚠️ Enhanced
- What’s New/Enhanced: Aligns with modern sustainability and FSSC v6 requirements. The management of Food Loss and Waste (FLW) is explicitly included. There is a stronger focus on ensuring waste handling systems can manage realistic peak volumes and that temporary waste staging is controlled. Drainage design is critically linked to contamination prevention.
- Auditor Focus: “How do you manage waste container overflow during peak production runs?”
Clause 9: Equipment Suitability, Cleaning & Maintenance
- Change Level: ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION
- What’s New/Enhanced: Focuses on hygienic design throughout the equipment lifecycle. Modifications must be assessed for food safety impact. A formal post-maintenance release procedure—including cleaning verification and pre-use inspection—is now essential. The standard makes it clear: if equipment cannot be cleaned effectively due to its design, the system is non-compliant.
- Auditor Focus: “What is your process to ensure equipment is safe for production after a maintenance repair?”
Clause 10: Management of Purchased Materials
- Change Level: ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION
- What’s New/Enhanced: Elevates supplier management to an active, risk-based process. You must categorise suppliers and raw materials based on hazard risk and apply proportional controls (e.g., audits for high-risk, questionnaires for low-risk). There is an expectation to monitor supplier performance and review audit findings, not just collect certificates. This clause is a primary defence against food fraud.
- Auditor Focus: “When you receive a supplier’s audit report, do you review the non-conformances, or just check for a valid certificate?”
Clause 11: Storage, Warehousing & Transport
- Change Level: ⚠️ Enhanced & Integrated
- What’s New/Enhanced: Storage condition controls (temperature, humidity) must be active and verifiable. A significant change is that transportation is now included in the common PRP requirements (ISO 22002-100), emphasising that food safety extends beyond the factory gate. Expectations for vehicle/container fitness-for-purpose and cleaning between loads are clearer.
- Auditor Focus: “What checks do you perform on inbound raw material vehicles and outbound dispatch vehicles?”
Clause 12: Measures for Prevention of Contamination
- Change Level: ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION & RESTRUCTURED
- What’s New/Enhanced: This is a cornerstone clause integrating all contamination types. For food manufacturing, it requires documented segregation plans for allergens, pathogens, and other hazards—directly linking to Clause 5 (Zoning). It expands physical contamination control to all brittle materials (not just glass) and mandates meaningful inspections. Chemical control stresses the prevention of misuse through labelling and storage.
- Auditor Focus: “How do you prevent allergen cross-contact when using shared equipment, and where is this documented?”
Clause 13: Cleaning & Disinfection
- Change Level: ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION
- What’s New/Enhanced: Shifts from a task-based to a programme management approach. It requires documented programmes with clear responsibilities, risk-based frequencies, and—critically—verified effectiveness. Evidence must go beyond signed checklists to include methods like ATP swabs or visual audits. Control of cleaning chemicals and tools is more stringent.
- Auditor Focus: “How do you know your cleaning programme is effective, beyond the completed checklist?”
Clause 14: Personnel Hygiene & Employee Facilities
- Change Level: ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION IN EMPHASIS
- What’s New/Enhanced: While topics are familiar, the emphasis is now squarely on observed behaviour and consistent practice. A major new explicit requirement is that visitors, contractors, and temporary staff must meet the same hygiene standards as employees, including induction, issued PPE, and active supervision. Auditors will observe practices like handwashing.
- Auditor Focus: “Are visitors to your production floor held to the same hygiene standards as your operators?”
Clause 15: Product & Consumer Information
- Change Level: ⚠️ Enhanced
- What’s New/Enhanced: Strengthens the requirement to provide information that prevents consumer misuse. This goes beyond allergens and ingredients to include validated storage, preparation, and cooking instructions where safety depends on it. The control of label artwork and change management is highlighted.
- Auditor Focus: “Have you validated the cooking instructions on your label to ensure they achieve a safe internal temperature?”
Clause 16: Food Defence & Food Fraud
- Change Level: ⚠️ MAJOR REVISION
- What’s New/Enhanced: Transforms from general security to mandatory, documented risk assessments. You must conduct and document two separate plans: a Food Defence Threat Assessment (for intentional acts of harm) and a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (for economically motivated adulteration). These must be reviewed regularly and have implemented mitigation plans.
- Auditor Focus: “Can you show me your documented food fraud vulnerability assessment for your high-value ingredients?”
Clause 17: Rework
- Change Level: ⚠️ Enhanced
- What’s New/Enhanced: Places stronger emphasis on traceability and risk-based decision-making. Rework must be fully traceable to its original batch and its final usage. Its use must be governed by clear rules on type, quantity, and condition—not ad hoc decisions driven by production pressure. Segregation and identification are mandatory.
- Auditor Focus: “If I point to a container of rework, can you trace it back to the original production batch and forward to where it was used?”
Clause 18: Product Recall Procedures
- Change Level: REMOVED from the PRP standard.
- What’s Changed: This clause has been deliberately removed from ISO 22002-1. Recall is now addressed at the food safety management system level in ISO 22000, reflecting that it is a crisis management function, not a hygiene-based prerequisite programme.
- Auditor Expectation: IMPORTANT: Auditors will still require a fully documented, tested recall procedure as part of your FSMS (ISO 22000). Its absence will result in a major non-conformance.
SECTION 3: Clause-by-Clause Change Summary for Food Manufacturers
This table summarises what’s new, what’s strengthened, and what’s similar across all key clauses.
| Clause | Title | Change Level | Key Focus of New/Enhanced Requirements |
| 4 | Construction & Layout | ⚠️ Enhanced | Fitness for purpose, environmental risk assessment, drainage justification. |
| 5 | Layout of Facilities & Workspaces | ⚠️ Enhanced | Risk-based zoning, traffic flow patterns, equipment location for cleanability. |
| 6 | Utilities | ⚠️ Enhanced | Use-specific quality standards, active monitoring, non-potable water identification. |
| 7 | Pest Control | ⚠️ Major | Preventive system, competent person, trend analysis, harbourage removal. |
| 8 | Waste Management | ⚠️ Enhanced | Food Loss/Waste (FLW) focus, drainage flow verification, container management. |
| 9 | Equipment | ⚠️ Major | Lifecycle hygienic design, post-maintenance release, cleanability verification. |
| 10 | Purchased Materials | ⚠️ Major | Risk-based supplier management, performance monitoring, intake verification. |
| 11 | Storage & Transport | ⚠️ Enhanced | Active condition control, dispatch vehicle checks, transport included in common PRPs. |
| 12 | Contamination Prevention | ⚠️ Major | Documented segregation/zoning plans, allergen cross-contact, brittle material management. |
| 13 | Cleaning & Disinfection | ⚠️ Major | Programme effectiveness, verification evidence, chemical control, CIP parameter monitoring. |
| 14 | Personnel Hygiene | ⚠️ Major | Observable behaviour, visitor/contractor controls equal to employees, and health reporting. |
| 15 | Product Information | ⚠️ Enhanced | Prevention of consumer misuse, validation of storage/preparation instructions. |
| 16 | Food Defence & Fraud | ⚠️ Major | Mandatory threat & vulnerability assessments, implementation of mitigation plans. |
| 17 | Rework | ⚠️ Enhanced | Enhanced traceability, risk-based usage decisions, and segregation. |
| Recall | Product Recall | Moved | Addressed at the management system level (ISO 22000), not at the PRP level. |
SECTION 4: Your Strategic Implementation Roadmap
Foundation & Gap Analysis (Now – V7 Publication)
- Acquire the Standards: Obtain ISO 22002-100:2025 and ISO 22002-1:2025.
- Form a Team: Assemble a cross-functional team (QA, Production, Maintenance, Sanitation).
- Conduct a Detailed Gap Analysis: Review each clause against your current system using the insights in Section 2.
- Update all affected procedures, work instructions, and records.
- Train all relevant personnel on the why and how of the changes.
- Conduct an internal audit against the new standards.
- Perform a mock recall to test traceability – focusing on the traceability of rework
Conclusion: Where Do You Go From Here?
View this PRP update as an opportunity to enhance your food safety system’s intelligence and resilience, rather than just more paperwork. Major changes—such as mapping your plant zones based on actual risk, verifying that your cleaning processes are effective, and thoroughly evaluating fraud risks—are aimed at strengthening your foundation for a robust HACCP System, not merely passing an audit.
You have a clear runway with the FSSC 22000 Version 7 timeline, so get started by purchasing the new PRP standards and conducting a gap assessment to identify the changes that need to be implemented.
Contact us at info@entecom.co.za if you need help with the gap assessment or with the updating of any of your documents.